A Principle-Based Analysis of Bipolar Argumentation Semantics

In this paper, we introduce and study seven types of semantics for bipolar argumentation frameworks, each extending Dung’s interpretation attack with a distinct support. First, three defence-based by adapting the notions defence. Second, examine two selection-based that select extensions counting number supports. Third, analyse traditional reduction-based under deductive necessary interpretations We provide full analysis twenty-eight ten principles.